Skip to main content

Become a Judge

Join our expert panel to evaluate student projects and contribute your industry expertise to educational research.

🎯 Why Your Expertise Matters​

As an industry professional, your evaluation helps us understand:

  • Which AI-assisted solutions are production-ready
  • What skills students still need to develop
  • How well AI tools prepare students for real-world development
  • Where educational curricula should focus their efforts

👨‍⚖️ Judge Profiles We Need​

Senior Developers & Architects​

  • Experience: 5+ years in software development
  • Expertise: Code quality, system design, best practices
  • Focus: Technical implementation and architecture evaluation

Engineering Managers & Team Leads​

  • Experience: 3+ years leading development teams
  • Expertise: Project management, team collaboration, delivery
  • Focus: Teamwork, process, and professional readiness

Product Managers & Technical Directors​

  • Experience: Business-focused technical roles
  • Expertise: User experience, market viability, innovation
  • Focus: Problem-solving approach and solution effectiveness

AI/ML Specialists​

  • Experience: Working with AI development tools professionally
  • Expertise: AI tool usage, prompt engineering, limitations
  • Focus: Effective AI collaboration and tool usage

Startup Founders & CTOs​

  • Experience: Building products from scratch
  • Expertise: Rapid development, resource efficiency, scalability
  • Focus: Innovation, resourcefulness, and practical impact

📊 Judging Framework​

Primary Evaluation Categories (70% of score)​

1. Technical Implementation (25%)​

What You'll Assess:

  • Code quality and organization
  • Architecture and design patterns
  • Performance and scalability considerations
  • Security and error handling

AI-Specific Considerations:

  • Effective use of AI-generated code
  • Quality review of AI outputs
  • Integration of AI and human-written code
  • Understanding of AI tool limitations

2. Problem-Solving Approach (25%)​

What You'll Assess:

  • Problem decomposition and analysis
  • Solution design and planning
  • Debugging and troubleshooting skills
  • Adaptability when approaches fail

Traditional vs AI Skills:

  • Independent thinking without AI assistance
  • Ability to direct and guide AI tools effectively
  • Critical evaluation of AI suggestions
  • Fallback strategies when AI fails

3. Learning & Adaptation (20%)​

What You'll Assess:

  • How quickly students learn new concepts
  • Adaptation to unfamiliar tools or frameworks
  • Response to feedback and mentoring
  • Growth demonstrated during the event

Educational Research Value:

  • Documentation of learning process
  • Reflection on AI vs traditional methods
  • Contribution to research questions
  • Insights shared with other participants

Secondary Evaluation Categories (30% of score)​

4. Innovation & Creativity (10%)​

  • Novel applications of AI tools
  • Creative problem-solving approaches
  • Unique features or implementations
  • Potential real-world impact

5. Collaboration & Communication (10%)​

  • Team dynamics and contribution
  • Code documentation and explanation
  • Presentation and demonstration skills
  • Mentoring and helping other participants

6. Professional Readiness (10%)​

  • Code organization and best practices
  • Version control usage
  • Testing and validation approaches
  • Deployment and documentation quality

📋 Judging Process​

Pre-Event Preparation (1-2 hours)​

  1. Orientation Session: Understanding research goals and evaluation criteria
  2. Platform Training: Familiarization with submission and scoring systems
  3. Rubric Review: Detailed discussion of evaluation standards
  4. Team Assignment: Pairing with complementary expertise judges

Event Day Activities (6-8 hours)​

  1. Opening Presentation (30 min): Meet participants and explain judging process
  2. Project Visits (4-5 hours): Circulate among teams, observe progress, provide feedback
  3. Final Presentations (2-3 hours): Evaluate completed projects and presentations
  4. Scoring & Deliberation (1 hour): Complete evaluations and discuss rankings

Post-Event Activities (1-2 hours)​

  1. Feedback Compilation: Detailed comments for participants
  2. Research Insights: Share observations with research team
  3. Follow-up Opportunities: Recruitment and mentoring connections

🏆 Recognition Categories​

Major Awards​

  • Best AI-Assisted Innovation: Most creative use of AI tools
  • Industry-Ready Solution: Production-quality application
  • Most Educational Impact: Advances programming education
  • Outstanding Collaboration: Exceptional teamwork and knowledge sharing

Special Recognition​

  • Debugging Excellence: Superior troubleshooting skills
  • Code Quality Champion: Cleanest, most maintainable code
  • Rapid Learning Award: Greatest skill development during event
  • Mentorship Impact: Most helpful to other participants

Potential Sponsor-Provided Awards​

As we grow our industry partnerships, we hope to offer:

  • Custom challenges from partner companies
  • Internship and job opportunities
  • Technology credits and subscriptions
  • Conference tickets and professional development
  • Small monetary prizes (amounts TBD based on sponsorship)

💡 Judge Benefits​

Professional Development​

  • Industry Networking: Connect with educators and other professionals
  • Talent Identification: Early access to emerging developers
  • Research Insights: Understand AI impact on software development
  • Teaching Skills: Develop mentoring and evaluation abilities

Recruitment Opportunities​

  • Resume Access: View participant profiles and project portfolios
  • Direct Interaction: Assess candidates through real problem-solving
  • Intern Pipeline: Identify students for internship programs
  • Long-term Relationships: Build connections for future hiring

Company Benefits​

  • Brand Visibility: Associate with educational innovation
  • Community Impact: Contribute to programming education improvement
  • Research Access: Insights into AI development productivity
  • Employee Engagement: Professional development for your team members

📅 Time Commitment​

Minimum Commitment​

  • Preparation: 2 hours (online orientation)
  • Event Day: 8 hours (Saturday of hackathon weekend)
  • Follow-up: 1 hour (feedback and evaluation completion)
  • Total: ~11 hours over 2 weeks

Extended Involvement Options​

  • Mentorship Program: Ongoing guidance for selected participants
  • Curriculum Advisory: Input on educational content development
  • Research Collaboration: Participation in academic studies
  • Speaking Opportunities: Present findings at conferences

🤝 Support & Training​

Judge Orientation Program​

  • Research Background: Understanding the educational context
  • Evaluation Training: Consistent and fair assessment techniques
  • AI Tool Familiarization: Understanding tools students will use
  • Communication Skills: Effective feedback and mentoring approaches

During-Event Support​

  • Coordinator Access: Dedicated staff for questions and issues
  • Evaluation Platform: User-friendly scoring and feedback systems
  • Peer Consultation: Collaborate with other judges on difficult evaluations
  • Research Team: Direct access to academic researchers

Post-Event Resources​

  • Impact Reports: See how your evaluations contributed to research
  • Participant Updates: Follow-up on students you mentored
  • Research Publications: Access to academic papers using your insights
  • Community Network: Ongoing connection with education professionals

📊 Judge Application Process​

Application Requirements​

  1. Professional Background: Resume highlighting relevant experience
  2. Motivation Statement: Why you want to judge and what you'll contribute
  3. Availability Confirmation: Commitment to required time periods
  4. References: Professional contacts (optional but preferred)

Selection Criteria​

  • Technical Expertise: Relevant industry experience and skills
  • Educational Interest: Commitment to improving programming education
  • Communication Skills: Ability to provide constructive feedback
  • Availability: Can commit to required time periods
  • Diversity: Balanced representation across roles, companies, and backgrounds

Application Timeline​

  • Applications Open: 3 months before hackathon
  • Review Period: 6 weeks for evaluation and selection
  • Notifications: 4 weeks before event
  • Orientation: 2 weeks before hackathon
  • Final Confirmation: 1 week before event

💼 Previous Judge Testimonials​

Sarah Chen, Senior Software Engineer, TechCorp​

"Judging gave me incredible insight into how the next generation of developers thinks about problem-solving. I was amazed by their creativity with AI tools and hired two participants as interns."

Michael Rodriguez, Engineering Manager, StartupInc​

"The research aspect made this more meaningful than typical hackathons. My evaluation contributed to actual educational research that will help universities prepare students better."

Dr. Emily Watson, CTO, AI Solutions​

"I learned as much from the students as they learned from me. Their fresh approaches to AI-assisted development inspired changes in our company's development practices."

📞 Apply to Judge​

Ready to Join Our Expert Panel?​

  1. Complete Judge Application Form
  2. Schedule Information Session
  3. Join Our Judge Community Discord

Questions?​

Your industry expertise is crucial for evaluating student progress and contributing to educational research. Join us in shaping the future of programming education. 🎯

Apply Now to Become a Judge 👨‍⚖️